This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: glibc 2.24 --- Starting soft/slush freeze discussion
- From: Marko Myllynen <myllynen at redhat dot com>
- To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 14:24:56 +0300
- Subject: Re: glibc 2.24 --- Starting soft/slush freeze discussion
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <57757DBB.2060404@linaro.org> <20160705190853.GA19033@aurel32.net> <577C0AA9.2000500@linaro.org>
- Reply-to: Marko Myllynen <myllynen at redhat dot com>
Hi,
On 2016-07-05 22:29, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> On 05/07/2016 16:08, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> On 2016-06-30 17:14, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>>
>> Also on the features side, it would be nice to get the ca_ES@valencia
>> and de_LI locales, they have already been posted a few months ago, so I
>> think they just need a final review:
>> - https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-06/msg01267.html
>> - https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-06/msg01266.html
>
> I am not sure about the policy for new locales and I tend to see them
> as new features. I know it has been posted some time ago, but I think
> we should move them to 2.25.
de_LI seems very straightforward, it should be safe to include in 2.24.
However, since ca_ES might warrant a bit of additional higher level
discussion whether locales without the corresponding ISO 639 code are
acceptable today, it might be safer to postpone ca_ES to 2.25.
Thanks,
--
Marko Myllynen