This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: glibc 2.24 --- Starting soft/slush freeze discussion
- From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien at aurel32 dot net>
- To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 21:08:53 +0200
- Subject: Re: glibc 2.24 --- Starting soft/slush freeze discussion
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <57757DBB.2060404@linaro.org>
On 2016-06-30 17:14, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As stated in a previous messages the idea is to start soft/slushy freeze mode
> tomorrow July 1st. There were some discussion about delay it for a week [1],
> but I see no compelling reasons to do so. As stated by Torvald, the new
> rwlock implementation will take some more days and he also made no promises.
> The tunables is something I think we would like to add, but I think we can
> either drop it again for new release or continue the discussion based on
> IFUNC enable/disable [2].
>
> I will spend some time tomorrow compiling the release blockers for 2.24, so
> please use this thread as placeholder to discuss them. I would like to
> have them defined by the end of tomorrow.
>
Probably a bit late, but I would like to see this bug fixed if possible:
- https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-06/msg01070.html (BZ#19810)
Also on the features side, it would be nice to get the ca_ES@valencia
and de_LI locales, they have already been posted a few months ago, so I
think they just need a final review:
- https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-06/msg01267.html
- https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-06/msg01266.html
Also, is it still find to commit ULPs updates like this one?
- https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-07/msg00054.html
Thanks,
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net