This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] elf: Add declarations for BPF
- From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, hsowa at redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:33:52 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] elf: Add declarations for BPF
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1465322879-30114-1-git-send-email-rth at twiddle dot net> <57571C1A dot 4060702 at redhat dot com> <1465328516 dot 11520 dot 60 dot camel at redhat dot com>
On 06/07/2016 03:41 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-07 at 15:10 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> On 06/07/2016 02:07 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> The e_machine value is provisionary, but will serve for now.
>>> I want to use this value in elfutils and systemtap. I will
>>> also propagate the value to llvm and their bpf backend.
>>>
>>> The R_BPF_MAP_FD value is being used by llvm, although they are
>>> using the name R_X86_64_64, which is perhaps less than ideal. ;-)
>>
>> Who defines the e_machine values these days?
>
> Apparently it is still SCO (at least it was a year ago):
> http://moxielogic.org/blog/elf-machine-number.html
> " Just send a nice email requesting the number assignment to
> registry@sco.com and they'll increment their most recent number and add
> you to the list."
>
> But it might be that it moved to registry@uxsglobal.com. That seems to
> be the last address used on the sysv-gabi mailinglist. If that also
> doesn't work, then best to ask on the sysv-gabi mailinglist itself
> generic-abi@googlegroups.com
How did we get a temporary value without knowing who to contact? :}
--
Cheers,
Carlos.