This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH 1/3] localedata: use same comment_char/escape_char in these files
- From: Marko Myllynen <myllynen at redhat dot com>
- To: Chris Leonard <cjlhomeaddress at gmail dot com>
- Cc: libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 14:19:04 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] localedata: use same comment_char/escape_char in these files
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1455954855-26431-1-git-send-email-vapier at gentoo dot org> <20160225201222 dot GK19841 at vapier dot lan> <20160309222439 dot GZ6588 at vapier dot lan> <56E29E8F dot 50209 at redhat dot com> <CAHdAatZoQ-G0Y-m1O0+vjysCT++Nek_kKdfMc5FQoH3MPZL9PA at mail dot gmail dot com>
- Reply-to: Marko Myllynen <myllynen at redhat dot com>
Hi,
On 2016-03-11 16:24, Chris Leonard wrote:
> I know that there are a number of glibc locales that I have
> contributed that are not represented in CLDR. Working with OLPC and
> Sugar Labs as I do, we are often on the bleeding edge of supporting
> new languages on GNUI/Linux-based systems.
Yes, locales only present in glibc but not in CLDR can't be
automatically updated (and most definitely won't be tossed away).
Do you have any rough estimate how many such locales there might be?
Thanks,
--
Marko Myllynen