This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 3/5] localedata: CLDRv28: update LC_ADDRESS.country_name translations


On 23 Feb 2016 19:16, Keld Simonsen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:41:25AM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > On 02/23/2016 04:04 AM, Keld Simonsen wrote:
> > >> However, I can't confirm that the working draft is identical to
> > >> the final published copy, the glibc relevant i18ln data might
> > >> have been removed before publication (doubtful).
> > > 
> > > The WD 10 of 30112 is an enhanced version of TR 30112:2014
> > > http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC35/WG5/docs/30112d10.pdf
> > > No data has been removed in either the published TR nor the WD.
> > > 
> > > See also my previous post on this subject yesterday.
> > > There is a GPL licence on all the data in 30112 taken from glibc.
> > 
> > I assume you mean page 8?
> > 
> > "The complete "i18n" FDCC-set is defined as the sum of the "i18n"
> >  categories specified in the clauses below. The ?i18n?
> >  FDCC-set and its parts are released under the GNU Public License,
> >  version 2, as it is taken from glibc sources."
> > 
> > Does this conflict with the "Copright ISO/IEC 2014 All Rights
> > Reserved" on the bottom of every page?
> 
> The use of other licenses like open source licenses are used in
> many ISO standards. I see it a a dual license, the ISO copyright
> and the GPL license.

copyrights aren't licenses.  "all rights reserved" is meaningless
splatter that companies insist on posting everywhere still.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_rights_reserved#Obsolescence
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]