This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 23 Feb 2016 19:16, Keld Simonsen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:41:25AM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > On 02/23/2016 04:04 AM, Keld Simonsen wrote: > > >> However, I can't confirm that the working draft is identical to > > >> the final published copy, the glibc relevant i18ln data might > > >> have been removed before publication (doubtful). > > > > > > The WD 10 of 30112 is an enhanced version of TR 30112:2014 > > > http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC35/WG5/docs/30112d10.pdf > > > No data has been removed in either the published TR nor the WD. > > > > > > See also my previous post on this subject yesterday. > > > There is a GPL licence on all the data in 30112 taken from glibc. > > > > I assume you mean page 8? > > > > "The complete "i18n" FDCC-set is defined as the sum of the "i18n" > > categories specified in the clauses below. The ?i18n? > > FDCC-set and its parts are released under the GNU Public License, > > version 2, as it is taken from glibc sources." > > > > Does this conflict with the "Copright ISO/IEC 2014 All Rights > > Reserved" on the bottom of every page? > > The use of other licenses like open source licenses are used in > many ISO standards. I see it a a dual license, the ISO copyright > and the GPL license. copyrights aren't licenses. "all rights reserved" is meaningless splatter that companies insist on posting everywhere still. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_rights_reserved#Obsolescence -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |