This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] BZ #19575: Clarify status of entries in GB 18030-2005.
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:51:49 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] BZ #19575: Clarify status of entries in GB 18030-2005.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <56B8FA69 dot 8030508 at redhat dot com> <87mvrakhab dot fsf at linux-m68k dot org> <56B90D0C dot 7090000 at redhat dot com> <87a8nakfq6 dot fsf at linux-m68k dot org> <56B92BC9 dot 7010103 at redhat dot com> <mvma8naxnxs dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de> <56B9B942 dot 2030203 at redhat dot com> <mvm60xyw5ni dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de> <56B9BD56 dot 70709 at redhat dot com> <mvm1t8mw509 dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de> <56B9F179 dot 1060803 at redhat dot com> <mvmmvrat0wp dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de> <56BA0E93 dot 1060300 at redhat dot com> <mvm60xxu8su dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de> <56BA25CC dot 8040303 at redhat dot com> <mvmfux1rko9 dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de> <56BB430C dot 7090901 at redhat dot com> <mvmoabor6tw dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de> <56BB4E42 dot 1020906 at redhat dot com> <mvm7ficr21p dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de>
On 02/10/2016 10:57 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> May I ask why such a list of updated mappings is relevant here?
>
> There are exactly 24 code point differences between -2000 and -2005. Go
> figure.
I did not say that. There are only 24 PUA code points in -2005 which as of
Unicode 4.1 can be represented as non-PUA code points.
The differences between -2000 and -2005 are very large, as I outlined in
the rest of my response.
Do you have a sustained opposition to my additional documentation of the
non-normative mappings listed in the GB 18030-2005 charmap?
Cheers,
Carlos.