This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: malloc: performance improvements and bugfixes
- From: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs dot nagy at arm dot com>
- To: Jörn Engel <joern at purestorage dot com>, Torvald Riegel <triegel at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "GNU C. Library" <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh dot poyarekar at gmail dot com>, Joern Engel <joern at purestorage dot org>, <nd at arm dot com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 14:24:59 +0000
- Subject: Re: malloc: performance improvements and bugfixes
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Nodisclaimer: True
- References: <1453767872-19161-1-git-send-email-joern at purestorage dot com> <1453810961 dot 4592 dot 100 dot camel at localhost dot localdomain> <20160126171435 dot GG5745 at Sligo dot logfs dot org> <1453828825 dot 4592 dot 108 dot camel at localhost dot localdomain> <20160126172629 dot GH5745 at Sligo dot logfs dot org> <1453829759 dot 4592 dot 116 dot camel at localhost dot localdomain> <20160126175940 dot GK5745 at Sligo dot logfs dot org> <1453900833 dot 4592 dot 134 dot camel at localhost dot localdomain> <20160127173842 dot GQ5745 at Sligo dot logfs dot org>
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
On 27/01/16 17:38, Jörn Engel wrote:
> Another btw, I created my own testcases because it was less painful to
> do so than to extract testcases from libc, tcmalloc or jemalloc. Not
> that I am setting a good example, but clearly none of these projects
> care about some other allocator reusing their testcases.
i had similar experience with libc testing in general,
musl only has a few trivial benchmarks
http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/libc-bench/tree/malloc.c
your code looks useful