Re: Clean up state on patchwork

[Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>]

On 25 Sep 2015 20:36, Joseph Myers wrote:
> I've now cleaned up patchwork state for submitters with only a few patches 
> in the alphabetical ranges I previously skipped.  The following submitters 
> still have large numbers of patches which I have not attempted to go 
> through and their patchwork entries still need cleaning up to make sure 
> that only the most recent versions of uncommitted patches are listed, with 
> others being marked as superseded / committed / ....
> 
> Alexandre Oliva
> Andreas Schwab
> Andrew Pinski
> Florian Weimer
> H.J. Lu
> Ondrej Bilka
> Paul Pluzhnikov
> Stefan Liebler
> Torvald Riegel
> 
> Would someone like to volunteer to clean up patchwork state for those 
> submitters, or to do the next general cleanup of all pending patches in 
> patchwork (say, once we have a system for most commits no longer to need 
> to update ChangeLog or NEWS, and for automatically marking committed 
> patchwork entries for patches whose git-patch-id corresponds with that of 
> a commit, going through all the entries at that time to remove past 
> entries that are committed or superseded)?

i think they all have commit access to the glibc repo in which case they
should have access to the patchwork glibc instance in which case they
should be managing their patches themselves ?  if we can't get them to
do so, then we could just assign all patches to the person submitting
it and marked them as dropped ?  then it's back on them to make sure
their patches get merged.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature