Re: microblaze maintainer

[Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>]

On 06 Aug 2015 12:14, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2015, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > my microblaze patch bounced because david.holsgrove@xilinx.com is not a
> > valid address (anymore).  does that mean the arch is orphaned ?
> 
> Probably.  If the thread cancellation changes go in and no-one steps up to 
> do the microblaze / sh versions of those changes, we may need to deprecate 
> and then remove those architectures as unmaintained.

for orphaned arches, should we just push after a while if no one reviews ?
i.e. should we treat it like common code (requiring review) or like sysdep
code (the maintainer verifies & pushes).
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature