This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Another GLIBC build error with GCC6


> It looks like it works for any value where the most significant bit is
> set to 1.  Otherwise it gives a different value.  I don't know if we can
> count on that bit always being set or not.

DT_EXTRATAGIDX will only ever be used with the values near DT_FILTER.  To
follow the other existing models, elf.h should define DT_EXTRARNGLO (same
value as DT_AUXILIARY) and DT_EXTRARNGHI (same value as DT_FILTER) and:
#define DT_EXTRATAGIDX(tag) (DT_EXTRARNGHI - (tag)) /* Reverse order! */

DT_VERSIONRNGLO and DT_VERSIONRNGHI are missing too, though
DT_VERSIONTAGIDX is already defined using the same value that
DT_VERSIONRNGHI should have.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]