This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Machine maintainer veto.


On 06 Jul 2015 13:09, Steven Munroe wrote:
> It takes at least two to be constructive. Some like argue perfection or
> require convincing everyone (not just GLIBC community members) to change
> what they are already doing to a more "correct" way. Like saying users
> are stupid and they doing it wrong is not constructive. 

it doesn't logically follow that a bad solution should be deployed purely
because users can't be bothered to improve their practices.  so attempting
to justify a change based purely on "this is the only API users will use"
doesn't really fly in my mind.

(don't try and extrapolate this into specifics on the ppc/hwcaps issue as
that is a waste of time -- this thread is talking generalities.)
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]