This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 06/25] Add struct scratch_buffer and its internal helper functions


Florian Weimer wrote:
I would rather go with intmax_t because it's not
clear to me if __alignof__ (max_align_t) increases to 64 if AVX-512 is
enabled on x86_64.

That would be a bug in the C compiler, right?

Since C allows platforms where pointers and/or floating-point values have alignments stricter than intmax_t, I suggest using 'max (__alignof__ (intmax_t), __alignof__ (max_align_t))' along with a comment explaining why you don't trust max_align_t here.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]