This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] [BZ 17588 13064] Update UTF-8 charmap and width to Unicode 7.0.0
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: Daiki Ueno <ueno at gnu dot org>
- Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, Pravin Satpute <psatpute at redhat dot com>, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>, Mike FABIAN <mfabian at redhat dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:55:02 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] [BZ 17588 13064] Update UTF-8 charmap and width to Unicode 7.0.0
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <573624784 dot 8871393 dot 1416848051220 dot JavaMail dot zimbra at redhat dot com> <orzjb3o7yf dot fsf at free dot home> <s9dy4qir6fu dot fsf at ari dot site> <orfvce7y90 dot fsf at free dot home> <s9d388duu5r dot fsf at ari dot site> <orioh35mbq dot fsf at free dot home> <20141223111038 dot GA5172 at spoyarek dot pnq dot redhat dot com> <119234933 dot 5523688 dot 1422972847328 dot JavaMail dot zimbra at redhat dot com> <or7fvnlbeo dot fsf at livre dot home> <orwq3njuvc dot fsf at livre dot home> <mvmr3tv8las dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de> <m3twym9yt2 dot fsf-ueno at gnu dot org> <54E232E0 dot 60705 at redhat dot com> <87k2zh8suc dot fsf-ueno at gnu dot org>
On 02/16/2015 04:11 PM, Daiki Ueno wrote:
> "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com> writes:
>
>>> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/tree/lib/uniname/uniname.c#n207
>>> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/tree/lib/uniname/uniname.c#n230
>>
>> Could I ask you to file a bug for this *after* the new changes are accepted?
>>
>> That way the bug can be used to track this enhancement.
>
> Well, that's not just an enhancement, but would significantly reduce the
> size of the patch, around 22344 lines (= the number of Hangul syllable
> characters * 2) of 61024 lines. That's why I asked that before merging.
That's still an enhancement. I think it's a good enhancement, but it's still
an enhancement over the existing scripts.
This is a consensus based community though. If you strongly object to doing
this in two stages, please say so now. Otherwise we can do this in multiple
steps.
Cheers,
Carlos.