This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: glibc 2.21 - Machine maintainers, please test your machines.


Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com> writes:

> I don't think so, because in a badly 4B-aligned (ie, no 8B-aligned) use,
> struct new_sem is at offset 4 of the semaphore.  If you copy that to a
> 8B-aligned semaphore just bit-by-bit, then the actual data will still
> start at offset 4, but to_new_sem will assume offset 0.

It is undefined to use a copy of a sem_t in any of the semaphore calls.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]