This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
RE: GNU C LIbrary 2.21 freeze date -- January 9th.
- From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: "Senkevich, Andrew" <andrew dot senkevich at intel dot com>
- Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, "Zamyatin, Igor" <igor dot zamyatin at intel dot com>, "Melik-Adamyan, Areg" <areg dot melik-adamyan at intel dot com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 16:24:10 +0000
- Subject: RE: GNU C LIbrary 2.21 freeze date -- January 9th.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <54AC3FB0 dot 4040701 at redhat dot com> <D373487E0338A646909492FF43BA8BE329748F8F at CDSMSX102 dot ccr dot corp dot intel dot com> <54AD27E5 dot 5050406 at redhat dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1501071310150 dot 24704 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <D373487E0338A646909492FF43BA8BE32974902B at CDSMSX102 dot ccr dot corp dot intel dot com>
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015, Senkevich, Andrew wrote:
> > I was waiting for consensus on the ABI documentation before reviewing the final patches. Have there been public
> > statements from GCC / LLVM / ICC maintainers agreeing that the proposed ABI documentation describes how they
> > intend to interpret the OpenMP pragmas on x86_64? If not, you need to work on pushing things to consensus in those
> > communities.
>
> Joseph, no such statements from maintainers were published now, but no
> objections also.
In that case I think you should chase it up with the relevant maintainers
and try to get positive consensus on the ABI.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com