This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
RE: [PATCHv4, MIPS] Add support for O32 FPXX and program header based ABI information
- From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Matthew Fortune <Matthew dot Fortune at imgtec dot com>
- Cc: "'libc-alpha at sourceware dot org'" <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, "Moore, Catherine (Catherine_Moore at mentor dot com)" <Catherine_Moore at mentor dot com>, 'Andrew Pinski' <pinskia at gmail dot com>, "Rich Felker (dalias at libc dot org)" <dalias at libc dot org>, Rich Fuhler <Rich dot Fuhler at imgtec dot com>, "'macro at codesourcery dot com'" <macro at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 17:08:03 +0000
- Subject: RE: [PATCHv4, MIPS] Add support for O32 FPXX and program header based ABI information
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <6D39441BF12EF246A7ABCE6654B0235320F8DFA4 at LEMAIL01 dot le dot imgtec dot org> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1412311718240 dot 26199 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <6D39441BF12EF246A7ABCE6654B0235320F93196 at LEMAIL01 dot le dot imgtec dot org> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1412312231120 dot 26199 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <6D39441BF12EF246A7ABCE6654B0235320F93944 at LEMAIL01 dot le dot imgtec dot org> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1501021836470 dot 25454 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <6D39441BF12EF246A7ABCE6654B0235320F967A3 at LEMAIL01 dot le dot imgtec dot org>
On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> writes:
> > On Fri, 2 Jan 2015, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> > > (N64/O32/N32 unexpected pass)
> > > XPASS: conform/ISO11/complex.h/conform
> > > XPASS: conform/ISO11/stdalign.h/conform
> > > XPASS: conform/ISO11/stdnoreturn.h/conform
> >
> > Expected whenever testing with GCC 4.7 or later - the XFAILs are there
> > for people using GCC 4.6 and can be removed when 4.6 is no longer
> > supported.
>
> Is the general consensus that these should be left to XPASS or (I believe)
> it should be possible to hook up a configure test to conditionally
> xfail these?
A configure test is of course possible - it just seems rather like
overkill.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com