This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Subsystem maintainers

From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>
To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 12:25:55 +0530
Subject: Re: Subsystem maintainers
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1409232040060 dot 8132 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1409301439570 dot 15186 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <542AC26E dot 5070906 at redhat dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1410071615260 dot 28196 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <54342BE2 dot 6000006 at redhat dot com>

On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 02:07:30PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > I'd be willing to be a subsystem maintainer in this sense for soft-fp and 
> > the conform/ tests.
> 
> We should see consensus on the idea of subsystem maintainers.
> 
> I'd like to see others comment that they are OK with the idea.

I am OK with Joseph as subsystem maintainer for the soft-fp and
conform bits.

Siddhesh

Attachment: pgp9HhWMJotMB.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- Subsystem maintainers
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Subsystem maintainers
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]