This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:22:31AM +0100, Will Newton wrote: > My opinion, FWIW, is that it would be really nice to have support for > LLVM and I think a lot of people would like to see it. > > I suspect a wholesale patch set for LLVM support would not be readily > accepted but each change would need to stand on its own and not make > the code more complex or difficult to maintain. Personally I find > nested functions to be surprising and not very helpful for readability > but I am sure there are others who disagree with that. I second this, especially the removal of nested functions. Siddhesh
Attachment:
pgpTjYgVQLCHs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |