This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] PowerPC: define _CALL_ELF if compiler does not define it
- From: Adhemerval Zanella <azanella at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
- To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 10:29:57 -0300
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] PowerPC: define _CALL_ELF if compiler does not define it
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <532C87B9 dot 6020905 at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com> <20140321201050 dot CE398744AC at topped-with-meat dot com> <53347225 dot 9040201 at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com> <mvmvbuq7ean dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de>
On 03-04-2014 10:06, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Adhemerval Zanella <azanella@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>
>> @@ -7199,9 +7200,9 @@ fi
>> $as_echo "$libc_cv_predef_stack_protector" >&6; }
>> libc_extra_cflags=
>> if test $libc_cv_predef_stack_protector = yes; then
>> - libc_extra_cflags=-fno-stack-protector
>> + libc_extra_cflags+=-fno-stack-protector
> Why is that needed? += is not a POSIX feature.
>
> Andreas.
>
It was just be pedantic and I wasn't aware it wasn't POSIX. I'll change to
libc_extra_cflags=$libc_extra_cflags " FLAGS"