This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [2.20] [2/6] Generate .test-result files for tests with special rules
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>
- Cc: <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:21:56 +0000
- Subject: Re: [2.20] [2/6] Generate .test-result files for tests with special rules
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1401100208000 dot 9412 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1401100211060 dot 9412 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <52FD9EDC dot 2040206 at redhat dot com>
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > * Should $(evaluate-test) go on the same line as the previous part of
> > the command if it fits, or always on a separate line (or on a
> > separate line unless the whole thing fits on a single line)? (Patch
> > 1 uses a single line; this patch generally puts it on the same line
> > as the previous part of the command if it fits.)
>
> Always on a separate line, though separate line unless the whole thing
> fits is also OK.
We need to decide this for the reworked version of patch 2 (which needs
substantial rework following my cleanup patches in any case), as well as
for patch 1 (current version
<https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-02/msg00429.html>). You prefer
always on a separate line. Brooks
<https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-02/msg00287.html> prefers
separate line unless the whole thing fits.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com