This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Move arm from ports to libc
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh dot poyarekar at gmail dot com>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:41:10 +0000
- Subject: Re: Move arm from ports to libc
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1402080154040 dot 12232 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <CAAHN_R0mZcu3X4eS5p3yS17yo0wfNAzycyUpjp=Rp6VzahYZ2Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1402080238030 dot 12232 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <CAAHN_R0Faa1G6LGr4SOO3smUYw0X8oUoD44T+P5=g+=oCW2Dng at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Sat, 8 Feb 2014, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> On 8 February 2014 08:10, Joseph S. Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
> > The aim is that the ports directory ends up containing only the old
> > ChangeLog files from the time ports were kept there, and nothing else
> > (well, maybe a minimal README). See bullet point 6 in
> > <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-01/msg00373.html>.
>
> Oh OK, I had read that as removing the ChangeLog files, but now that I
> read it again, I realized that you were referring to the ChangeLog
> files in nptl, localedata, etc.
I'm not proposing removing any ChangeLog files, just using the toplevel
ChangeLog for future entries (and I wasn't actually proposing that as
regards changes in nptl, libidn, localedata, although I think it would be
a good idea, just proposing it for ports that moved to libc).
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com