This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [COMMITTED] hppa: Regenerate libm-testulps.
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:44:42 -0500
- Subject: Re: [COMMITTED] hppa: Regenerate libm-testulps.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <52F00569 dot 9080003 at redhat dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1402041406580 dot 18044 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk>
On 02/04/2014 09:14 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> To clarify what you say on the wiki page, are you really claiming that
> hppa builds *without needing glibc patches*? It certainly looks to me as
> if some parts of NPTL will give errors in _STACK_GROWS_UP cases (although
> I don't expect fixes for that to be controversial, if you've tested them
> for hppa and can confirm disassembly of installed shared libraries is
> unchanged on a _STACK_GROWS_DOWN architecture ... any patches for which
> it's not immediately obvious other architectures are unaffected would need
> more careful review).
No, hppa still needs patches. I've updated the release page. Sorry for the
confusion.
Cheers,
Carlos.