This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: glibc 2.19 status?
- From: Allan McRae <allan at archlinux dot org>
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>, libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 11:36:14 +1000
- Subject: Re: glibc 2.19 status?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <52E649BF dot 5020400 at archlinux dot org> <20140128205657 dot 16DBA74438 at topped-with-meat dot com> <52E9DEB7 dot 4000709 at redhat dot com> <52E9E84F dot 50907 at redhat dot com> <52EA682D dot 90900 at archlinux dot org> <ormwid428y dot fsf at livre dot home> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1401302131080 dot 12540 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <orlhxvn1jp dot fsf at livre dot home>
On 01/02/14 10:01, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2014, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>> On Jan 30, 2014, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Any other issues that need tracking missing from that list?
>>>
>>> I'm not sure where the MTASC safety docs patchset fits in this, but
>>> several of the patches are in, and a number of others are pending review
>>> and should be in over the next few days. I hoped we'd have the patchset
>>> all in by now, but the process has been slower than anticipated.
>
>> I thought this documentation was incomplete anyway - that you hadn't
>> completed reviewing the properties of every function in glibc - or is the
>> latest version in fact complete?
>
> The latest patchset is indeed complete as in, every function in the
> glibc manual has a corresponding @safety note. There are glibc
> functions that are not documented in the manual, and most of these have
> not had their safety properties assessed.
>
> Carlos told me he'd have the review completed today/tonight, so it
> wouuld be appreciated if the release could be held up so as to include
> the entire patchset.
>
If that is the case, I will not have to hold up anything at all. There
is still a couple of decisions that need made before release.
Allan