This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Wiki discussion of standards conformance issues
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 04:51:18 -0500
- Subject: Re: Wiki discussion of standards conformance issues
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1401292228510 dot 24633 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <52E9C504 dot 3040902 at redhat dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1401301420340 dot 3467 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk>
On 01/30/2014 09:24 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>
>> Having bugs in the bugzilla for conformance bugs, appropriately marked
>> with agreed upon keyword, sounds good to me.
>>
>> Any new bugs I file that are conformance related I'll mark with a new
>> keyword (after adding such a keyword to bugzilla).
>>
>> Are there any keywords you'd like me to add?
>
> Given the number of different standards supported, I suggest starting with
>
> std-isoc Bug relating to support for ISO C standard (any version)
> std-posix Bug relating to support for POSIX or X/Open standard (any version)
>
> to avoid too much proliferation of keywords (where it would be likely some
> bugs relate to multiple standards).
>
Done.
Cheers,
Carlos.