This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [WIP] Remove nested function in elf/dl-lookup.c? (Nested functions considered harmful?)
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
- To: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 00:17:02 +0100
- Subject: Re: [WIP] Remove nested function in elf/dl-lookup.c? (Nested functions considered harmful?)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <52AC8036 dot 7000300 at redhat dot com> <20131216144049 dot GA19212 at spoyarek dot pnq dot redhat dot com> <52AF2659 dot 7010408 at redhat dot com> <201312161151 dot 02195 dot vapier at gentoo dot org>
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> writes:
> On Monday 16 December 2013 11:12:09 Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> One question I had was: Why is the original function
>> __attribute_noinline__?
>
> the original commit that added this:
> commit 021723ab784461de9eac57398ea16a47d4ab9366
Rather 871b91589bf4f6dfe19d5987b0a05bd7cf936ecc.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."