This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: build for sh fails with "fanotify_mark@@VERSION_libc_er"


"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:
> 	* sysdeps/unix/Makefile ($(objpfx)stub-syscalls.c): Use $$ver.
> 
> OK with that.

Committed with that change.  Thanks!

> My gut says that on all other targets we probably don't have
> any stubs so this never showed up because this code was never
> called. Every other architecture probably has fanotify_mark
> generated by a syscall wrapper, not a syscall stub.
> 
> So the followup question is why does sh use a do-nothing
> stub for this?

I thought that other targets use stubs too and only sh uses
fanotify_mark@@* instead of plain fanotify_mark symbol for it
in its syscalls.list to get properly versioning one.  I'll
take a look at other targets.

Regards,
	kaz


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]