This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thursday 07 November 2013 15:39:46 Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:31 PM, OndÅej BÃlka <neleai@seznam.cz> wrote: > > Hi, after reading a calloc code I found that we do not return memset > > value. Unless compiler can recognize that memset result and return value > > are same it will be used as normal call but a tail call is faster. > > It can and does in 4.8 and above but that is after the tail call > optimization happens. i wonder if we should merge OndÅej's fix with a comment like "we can drop this after we require gcc-4.8+. seems like an easy win for older compilers for no overhead on our side. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |