This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Move powerpc ports pieces to libc.
- From: "Ryan S. Arnold" <ryan dot arnold at gmail dot com>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Adhemerval Zanella <azanella at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>, libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:11:41 -0500
- Subject: Re: Move powerpc ports pieces to libc.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1309261728050 dot 13950 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <52458373 dot 4030301 at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1309271531060 dot 7561 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk>
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Joseph S. Myers
<joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Sep 2013, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the patch Joseph, I'm just thinking here the implication of this
>> change for multilib support. Although I didn't receive any reply for my
>> patches I still want to push them forward after Alan's LE patches. Currently
>
> I'm not clear on the status of those LE patches. There seem to have been
> a lot of different patches and patch series posted (some specifically LE,
> some more general ldbl-128ibm fixes), and at least some of the patches
> have been reviewed and approved, but none have been pushed. I think we
> need those patches that have been approved (and don't depend on unapproved
> patches) to be pushed, and the remaining patches to be reposted, so that
> it's clear what's left to be reviewed or revised for the LE support.
I think there's only one more patch that hasn't been reviewed/approved
and Adhemerval is going to take a look. Some of the reviews requested
some minor changes/updates.
Ryan S. Arnold