This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Improve strcpy: Faster unaligned loads.
- From: OndÅej BÃlka <neleai at seznam dot cz>
- To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 21:18:29 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Improve strcpy: Faster unaligned loads.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20130909153051 dot GA23047 at domone dot kolej dot mff dot cuni dot cz> <20130909161112 dot GB23047 at domone dot kolej dot mff dot cuni dot cz> <mvmbo42dkiq dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de> <20130909171703 dot GA32141 at domone dot kolej dot mff dot cuni dot cz> <87ob81c1yk dot fsf at igel dot home>
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 07:57:39PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> OndÅej BÃlka <neleai@seznam.cz> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 06:31:25PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >> OndÅej BÃlka <neleai@seznam.cz> writes:
> >>
> >> > * sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/strcpy-sse2-unaligned-new.S: New implementation.
> >>
> >> Calling something new is becoming outdated soon.
> >>
> > That was because I first wanted to move strcpy-sse2-unaligned to
> > strcpy-sse2-unaligned-old.S
>
> Calling something old isn't better, "new" old things coming along soon.
>
Should I then put it to strncpy-sse2-unaligned.S and add conditionals?