This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Update on freeze status of glibc 2.18?
- From: Andi Kleen <andi at firstfloor dot org>
- To: Torvald Riegel <triegel at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Andi Kleen <andi at firstfloor dot org>, Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>, Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Ryan Arnold <rsa at us dot ibm dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:24:54 +0200
- Subject: Re: Update on freeze status of glibc 2.18?
- References: <51BF3CF8 dot 1010901 at redhat dot com> <1371494971 dot 16968 dot 21574 dot camel at triegel dot csb> <20130617193649 dot 7B5872C08D at topped-with-meat dot com> <1371503900 dot 16968 dot 21902 dot camel at triegel dot csb> <20130619224234 dot 5AC132C10E at topped-with-meat dot com> <1371733830 dot 964 dot 1089 dot camel at triegel dot csb> <20130620140934 dot GZ6123 at two dot firstfloor dot org> <1371743530 dot 964 dot 1602 dot camel at triegel dot csb> <20130620205512 dot GD6123 at two dot firstfloor dot org> <1371765683 dot 964 dot 2885 dot camel at triegel dot csb>
> And it will not disallow elision for these cases. As Roland points out,
It would for existing binaries. I really don't want to recompile
everything. I don't think people recompile their binaries all
the time. Especially not for having deadlocks more often.
-Andi