This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Thread-, Signal- and Cancellation-safety documentation


On 06/10/2013 10:08 AM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
>>> If you wish to see a formal proof, why don't you (1) provide a proper
>>> definition and (2) *prove* that it doesn't have loopholes that render
>>> it useless?
>>
>> Because I'm not the one who's claiming there's a problem in the
>> standard.  The burden of showing that is yours, not mine.
> 
> It seems indeed like I can't explain the issues that I see in the
> standard's definition to you.  It would be helpful if at this point in
> the discussion, others can chime.

Someone needs to be responsible for summarizing the results
of the discussion into something that others can comment
on more usefully, either a patch against Alex's branch or
a wiki page with a definition.

Cheers,
Carlos.
 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]