This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v2] [BZ #10283] localedef: align fixed maps to SHMLBA


> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/mmap.html
> ~~~
> If MAP_FIXED is specified, the implementation may 
> require that addr is a multiple of the page size.
> ~~~
> Thus addr must be aligned to N*<page size>, where N is implementation
> specific.

I think you misread that.  "addr is a multiple of the page size" means the
same as "addr is aligned to page size".  The standard says that the
implementation may require that the address be aligned to page size (as
returned by sysconf).  It does not say that the implementation may impose
further restrictions on the address.

> Thus that PA/Linux and Sparc/Linux are all non-conforming implementations
> because they require N > 1?

That's my reading, yes.

> I agree that POSIX might change their wording to say that SHMLBA
> is the right value to use, but I bet you'll never get the Austin Group
> to agree to this kind of change without a lot of work.
> 
> Thus I'm happy to see some rationale text changes first :-)

Perhaps the place to start is an interpretation request to clarify whether
an implementation is allowed to impose a restriction on the bit-pattern of
the address other than it being aligned to page size.


Thanks,
Roland


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]