This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] libm-test.inc: Correctly implement ulp().
- From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf at tilera dot com>
- To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:40:07 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] libm-test.inc: Correctly implement ulp().
- References: <5195593A dot 7090202 at redhat dot com> <51968072 dot 2090606 at suse dot com> <51968291 dot 2010707 at redhat dot com>
On 5/17/2013 3:18 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 05/17/2013 03:09 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> Does this change mean we should regenerate the ULPs for all
>> architectures from scratch?
> As part of the final 2.18 release process everyone should be
> regenerating ulps from scratch.
Are we actually at that stage now? It does seem that Joseph is still pouring in his cool code-to-data rework changes for the math tests, and presumably it makes sense to hold off regenerating until that's complete?
--
Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp.
http://www.tilera.com