This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Tracking patch pings
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 00:55:04 -0400
- Subject: Re: Tracking patch pings
- References: <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1305152117141 dot 21321 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk>
On 05/15/2013 05:20 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> To raise more visibly something I mentioned in another thread:
>
> Should we have some system for tracking patches that are pending review,
> especially those that have been pinged? For example, there could be a
> list on the wiki page for the current release cycle of patches believed to
> be ready for review and the contribution checklist could say to add your
> patch there when pinging it. (Ideally we'd have people who specifically
> try to keep a lookout for unreviewed patches and add them to the list
> after a week even if not pinged.)
>
Someone pointed me at the fact that llvm is using phabricator.
http://llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html
http://www.phabricator.com/docs/phabricator/article/Installation_Guide.htmlï;
However, at this late hour the entire setup is way too complicated for me,
and still requires a lot more overhead than I'd like, but I thought I'd
mention it for the sake of completeness.
c.