This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC 2.0] Implementing hwcap2


On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> wrote:
> The calling convention for IFUNC resolvers is machine-specific.
> Thus, it's up to each machine maintainer to decide what it should be
> for his machine.  Given how rare IFUNC use still is, I'd say it's
> also up to each machine maintainer to decide whether or not an
> incompatible change to the convention is acceptable at this stage.
>
> It might be nice if these conventions were unified, but to get there
> from the status quo would require consensus among all the maintainers
> for machines that now support IFUNC at all.
>
> Ryan, I think what you need to do is go back and split your change up
> into the generic and machine-specific parts.  First, we can review
> the generic changes and come to a resolution on those parts.  (I
> reviewed them before, but since then I've concluded that there is
> some muddlation about what it means for 64-bit configurations and I
> think we should discuss it more.)  Once that's done, you can send a
> separate machine-specific change for each machine and hash out the
> IFUNC resolver calling convention with that machine's maintainer(s).

Thanks everyone who responded so far.

I'll do as Roland suggests and split the changes up so we can continue
to refine the IFUNC resolver separately from the rest of the HWCAP2
feature.

Thanks,
Ryan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]