This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Create nptl manual node and document thread_local limitation

From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh dot poyarekar at gmail dot com>
To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
Cc: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:43:18 +0530
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Create nptl manual node and document thread_local limitation
References: <20130220115335.GC26842@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com><5124F3E4.7030909@redhat.com><20130221050630.GH26842@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com><20130313125858.GL22471@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com><5140EB2F.3020705@redhat.com><CAAHN_R22AJszUrmCRN6Sj7jYFZtrekP=gqfbw0Txd+agAxG7ZA@mail.gmail.com><51413FCE.8070000@redhat.com>

On 14 March 2013 08:41, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:
> No, make it just "threads". We want to use "POSIX threads", "threads",
> or the name of the function. I'd like to avoid the term pthread, and
> NPTL unless specifically talking about "pthread_*" functions or
> defining "Native POSIX Thread Library" and talking directly about
> the implementation.
>
> Does that make sense?

OK, I'll make those changes and push the patch later today.

Thanks,
Siddhesh
-- 
http://siddhesh.in

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Create nptl manual node and document thread_locallimitation
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: [PATCH] Create nptl manual node and document thread_local limitation
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: [PATCH] Create nptl manual node and document thread_local limitation
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: [PATCH] Create nptl manual node and document thread_local limitation
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]