This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch] Memory fencing fixes

From: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:37:54 -0800
Subject: Re: [Patch] Memory fencing fixes
References: <51102A79.3020108@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1302202053460.26462@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <512BDA54.1000303@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1302260042500.8484@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

On 02/25/2013 04:51 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> With GCC 
> 4.8 you have the __ARM_ARCH macro that can be used in such conditionals, 
> but before that you just have the __ARM_ARCH_*__ macros for each 
> architecture version.

It's probably worth having a bit at the start of ports/sysdeps/arm/sysdep.h
that creates __ARM_ARCH from __ARM_ARCH_*__ if it's not already defined.

r~

References:
- [Patch] Memory fencing fixes
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: [Patch] Memory fencing fixes
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: [Patch] Memory fencing fixes
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: [Patch] Memory fencing fixes
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]