This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v4] Destructor support for C++11 thread_local variables

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>, "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:15:27 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Destructor support for C++11 thread_local variables
References: <20121017184033.109bcd89@spoyarek> <20121029085207.21957cd2@spoyarek> <20121029063837.GH1752@tucnak.redhat.com> <20121030193603.3993aa3c@spoyarek> <20121030200754.3680c8ba@spoyarek> <511D7339.4000705@redhat.com> <20130215053351.GC27403@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com>

On 02/15/2013 12:33 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:

OK, I need some clarification here, is DSO_HANDLE a handle returned by
dlopen() or simply a symbol within the DSO that the compiler has?
I assume the latter, otherwise I don't think this would work.

It's a symbol added (I think) by the linker.

It's a hidden symbol named __dso_handle from crtbegin.o.

Jason

References:
- Re: [PATCH v4] Destructor support for C++11 thread_local variables
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: [PATCH v4] Destructor support for C++11 thread_local variables
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]