This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Faster x^(2^m) for mpexp using __sqr

From: "Ryan S. Arnold" <ryan dot arnold at gmail dot com>
To: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>
Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot com>, libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, "Ryan S. Arnold" <rsa at us dot ibm dot com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:07:00 -0600
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Faster x^(2^m) for mpexp using __sqr
References: <20130212074031.GA15748@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com><20130212143442.GJ15748@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com><1870534.Xbm83QNf15@byrd><20130213081924.GR15748@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com>

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@redhat.com> wrote:
> Ryan, are the ppc bits OK?

In principle this looks fine but I'd like to see some comments
regarding what is happening in the while loops.

I'm not fond of the redundant code but that's how mpa.c is done at the
moment for powerpc.  Perhaps we can merge in the future.
Ryan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Faster x^(2^m) for mpexp using __sqr
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: [PATCH] Faster x^(2^m) for mpexp using __sqr
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar

References:
- [PATCH] Faster x^(2^m) for mpexp using __sqr
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: [PATCH] Faster x^(2^m) for mpexp using __sqr
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: [PATCH] Faster x^(2^m) for mpexp using __sqr
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: [PATCH] Faster x^(2^m) for mpexp using __sqr
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]