This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wednesday 28 November 2012 18:25:07 Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> wrote: > > On 11/28/2012 01:37 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > >> I'm curious, why doesn't it work well with gcc? > > > > Subversion, mostly. > > Right, so I didn't expect you to interpret it that > literally. I was thinking more about the process > and not the exact tools. there is a read-only git repo. i use that to manage patches and then use svn just for the commit. > All of this reminds me how much I dislike working > with cvs in binutils... I wonder how much energy > it would take to make gcc, gdb, and binutils all > start using git? there are git mirrors of binutils/gdb too. but this is a big topic full of worms that has been covered in a number of threads on the binutils list. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |