This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Link dynamic tests with newly built glibc


On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Joseph S. Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> In various places this patch removes use of run-program-prefix, or
> replaces built-program-cmd by built-program-file.
>
> Having such abstractions used to run tests is still useful towards
> supporting cross testing - the default setting of the prefix used when
> running a test program can be empty, but it's still useful to have a
> variable used for running them which could have a nonempty setting in the
> cross-test case.  I guess I'd rather see these places use e.g. new
> variables test-program-prefix and test-program-cmd (defaults empty and
> built-program-file), or something like that, as a basis for then adding
> more cross-test support.

What do you mean by "cross testing"?  Those tests can only be
run natively.

-- 
H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]