This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: Automatically test IFUNC implementations


On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:17 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Carlos O'Donell
> <carlos@systemhalted.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.com> wrote:
>>> So, you're building two libcs and one has this just extra symbol? In that
>>> case I suggest to build only one libc and have the symbol exported for
>>> everybody with a version in the namespace GLIBC_PRIVATE. My fear is that the
>>> duplicate building cases us more harm than good...
>>
>> I agree. We need to ship what we test. I don't want to see two libc's built.
>>
>
> That was my original patch:
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2010-11/msg00039.html
>
> But it was rejected.  I can go back to the old scheme, but always
> add __libc_func@GLIBC_PRIVATE when multi-arch is enabled.
>

I updated hjl/ifunc/test branch to put __libc_func in libc.so
with version GLIBC_PRIVATE.

-- 
H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]