This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thursday 16 August 2012 19:52:05 Roland McGrath wrote: > This adds the --disable-nscd configure option to make libc not try > to contact nscd at all. I've only done the most basic testing (on > x86_64-linux-gnu): 'make check' has no regressions, but that doesn't > really test any of the functionality affected. I did a few random > 'getent' runs by hand with the just-built (not installed) binaries > from a --disable-nscd build (on a system that didn't have nscd > running anyway), and they seemed to work fine. i've generally tried to avoid the nss layers of glibc, but i don't see anything crazy here maybe Ben Chan could give this a look over ... http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-08/msg00377.html http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-08/msg00340.html > I haven't decided what I think about that. Obvious options: > > 1. Leave it as it is, wholly separate options. People who use > --disable-nscd alone will get the subtly-different nscd built > (and installed). since we've got this work already, we can just merge this now and see about squashing later fwiw, in Gentoo, i'll have a single nscd flag that controls both options ;) -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |