Re: [PATCH] Changes to libc.pot for glibc core and ports.

[Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org>]

On 6/15/2012 1:27 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
>> Joseph, as always, raised a great point on IRC, that ports shouldn't
>> really be contributing any translatable messages. Translations belong
>> at a higher level and in glibc core. 
> 
> Indeed.  I didn't bother to whine about that though it came immediately to
> mind, because I'd long ago noted it and just muttered under my breath.
> 
>> Regardless of this point I don't want to loose a translation, and the
>> latter is a QoI issue that should be independent of our global support
>> for translations.
> 
> Or lose one, either.
> 

I've checked in the libc.pot update along with the scripts change
that enables others to reproduce the same result.

2012-06-21  Carlos O'Donell  <carlos_odonell@mentor.com>

        * scripts/list-sources.sh: Scan PORTS for translations.
        * po/libc.pot: Regenerated.

diff --git a/scripts/list-sources.sh b/scripts/list-sources.sh
index 53b6f7f..528e971 100755
--- a/scripts/list-sources.sh
+++ b/scripts/list-sources.sh
@@ -11,8 +11,21 @@ esac

 if [ -r .git/HEAD ]; then

-  exec ${GIT:-git} ls-files
-
+  # List files for glibc core.
+  ${GIT:-git} ls-files
+  # List files for glibc ports.
+  ports="ports"
+  if [ -d "$PWD/$ports" ]; then
+    cd "$PWD/$ports"
+    ${GIT:-git} ls-files | sed -e "s,^,$ports/,g"
+  else
+    # We expect the glibc-ports directory to be symlinked as PORTS.
+    # The glibc release manager will run this script as part of libc.pot
+    # regeneration and should ensure the symlink to PORTS is setup.
+    echo >&2 "WARNING: No \"$ports\" directory found. Expected glibc-ports"\
+            "source directory to be symlinked as \"$ports\" directory."
+  fi
+  exit 0
 fi

 echo >&2 'Cannot list sources without some version control system in use.'