This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix ynl return value with LDBL_MIN
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Marek Polacek <polacek at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 11:43:45 +0000 (UTC)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix ynl return value with LDBL_MIN
- References: <20120528134625.GD3030@redhat.com><CADZpyiwEKd+PDAFoWaYZHyUA+Naq6ui0mT-EgyrN2sUyhDJnpw@mail.gmail.com><Pine.LNX.4.64.1205281634330.357@digraph.polyomino.org.uk><20120528165355.GG3030@redhat.com> <20120607114654.GM31043@redhat.com>
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, Marek Polacek wrote:
> Ping.
>
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 06:53:55PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 04:36:59PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > > (a) Wait until one patch is in before submitting another.
> >
> > Okay, so let's get this one in first:
> > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/libc-alpha/2012-05/msg01857.html
> > (Not sure if ldbl-128 and ldbl-128ibm variants are buggy as well.)
If you want to get this one in first then you should send a version adding
a test to libm-test.inc (the test not conditioned, but only testing
exceptions and not errno - the other patch would then add the errno tests
for that test).
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com