This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: foo.s

From: David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>
To: roland at hack dot frob dot com
Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, libc-ports at sourceware dot org, rth at twiddle dot net
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 18:38:13 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: foo.s
References: <20120519.003852.1167279910667363123.davem@davemloft.net><20120519051409.CE5002C083@topped-with-meat.com>

From: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 22:14:09 -0700 (PDT)

>> It looks like only Alpha and HPPA have foo.s files any longer.
> 
> Then libc-ports is the place that needs to hear the request (CC'd).
> 
>> I did a quick scan over them in the glibc-ports tree and I see no
>> reason why changing them all over to foo.S would break things.
> 
> I can't imagine how it would.  (Actually I can, if there are foo.s files
> using identifiers that $(compile-command.S) predefines.  But it doesn't
> seem inordinately likely--who would be as foolish as i686?)

Carlos just took care of HPPA and therefore only Alpha is left.

Richard, could I trouble you do do the "foo.s --> foo.S" renames
for Alpha and do a test build?  I'd really appreciate it.

Once that's taken care of I'll post and commit the mainline patch
to get rid of the .s prefix rules.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: foo.s
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- foo.s
  - From: David Miller
- Re: foo.s
  - From: Roland McGrath

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]