This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Fixes for 2.15.1


On 2/27/2012 3:58 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> wrote:
>> On 2/24/2012 4:12 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>>>>> and didn't look at the question of backporting libc changes needed for the
>>>>> Tile ports.
>>>> If the tile ports went in using GLIBC_2.15 then it might be appropriate.
>>> Yes, the ports did go in the ports repository for 2.15.  I'll leave it to
>>> Chris to file any backport requests wanted.
>> Done.  The bugzillas are as follows; they are all for glibc core except the
>> last one, which bundles up a few tile-specific changes from glibc-ports.
>>
>> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13769
>> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13770
>> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13771
>> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13772
>> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13773
>> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13774
>>
>> A 2.15-based git tree with the relevant changes cherry-picked into it is in
>> "cmetcalf/tile-2.15".  It includes one extra commit that's not actually
>> needed in 2.15.1 (removing HAVE_ELF and NO_UNDERSCORES checks from
>> tile/sysdep.h), but it's harmless.
> Chris,
>
> Thanks! I'll review these.
>
> Cheers,
> Carlos.

Ping?  I looked at release/origin/2.15/master, and I don't see the changes
merged from my tile-2.15 tree yet, and the Bugzilla tracking bugs are all
still open.

I'm happy to merge these to the release branch myself if that would be helpful.

-- 
Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp.
http://www.tilera.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]