This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 0/2] BZ#10375 fixes

From: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot com>
Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 13:20:17 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] BZ#10375 fixes
References: <20120507230613.1D8222C06E@topped-with-meat.com><20120508031213.C54582C099@topped-with-meat.com><4FA89263.30605@archlinux.org><201205080938.01075.aj@suse.com><20120514231201.05E1A2C0A5@topped-with-meat.com><4FB2B7DB.5060808@suse.com>

> it does not fix the issue with adding in CFLAGS -fstack-protector 
> -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2" - but as I said before that's fine...

Yes, it's only intended to address built-in compiler behavior.

> The patch itself looks fine.

OK.  If nobody else speaks up by tomorrow, I'll merge it in.


Thanks,
Roland

References:
- [PATCH 0/2] BZ#10375 fixes
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] BZ#10375 fixes
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] BZ#10375 fixes
  - From: Allan McRae
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] BZ#10375 fixes
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] BZ#10375 fixes
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] BZ#10375 fixes
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]