This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] BZ #14059 - HAS_FMA4 check needs to also check for AVX

From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 08:31:04 -0600
Subject: Re: [PATCH] BZ #14059 - HAS_FMA4 check needs to also check for AVX
References: <hopqaf6pz3.fsf@byrd.suse.de> <CADZpyiyWVvZ0Z8+98rqfYYdWKKXEPVGpt18b=UbDnvfHM-50JA@mail.gmail.com> <CADZpyiycOx29T2-w2ctaoGz0jn6ZFPuiVRsSAN_=oKu1hV5y+g@mail.gmail.com> <4FACB302.2010407@suse.de> <CADZpyiyGONFHBvFt+HKvAB18+iCmL+f8mpN6=WTVJv2eESiw5A@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/11/2012 06:05 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:


Here's a combined patch that compiled fine for me on
Linux/x86-64. Jeff, could you test it under Xen, please?

I've finally got functional access to a box which exhibits the problem; so yes, I'll take this patch for a spin and report back.

jeff

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] BZ #14059 - HAS_FMA4 check needs to also check for AVX
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

References:
- [PATCH] BZ #14059 - HAS_FMA4 check needs to also check for AVX
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: [PATCH] BZ #14059 - HAS_FMA4 check needs to also check for AVX
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: [PATCH] BZ #14059 - HAS_FMA4 check needs to also check for AVX
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: [PATCH] BZ #14059 - HAS_FMA4 check needs to also check for AVX
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: [PATCH] BZ #14059 - HAS_FMA4 check needs to also check for AVX
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]