This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v3] tftp.h: rework layout to work with fortification

From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 11:30:39 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tftp.h: rework layout to work with fortification
References: <1334251838-2948-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org><1336369421-7388-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org><CADZpyiy8VU7gdDv-gOyNJnCDxOmGA2WrC+Bmu+akdE2FO-oaUQ@mail.gmail.com><Pine.LNX.4.64.1205071437260.16050@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Joseph S. Myers
<joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 May 2012, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>
>> It still doesn't work with -Wall -Werror -pedantic because zero sized
>> arrays are not allowed in ISO C.
>
> This should not give errors in system headers. ?Have you found such an
> error with the header installed in a system header directory? ?If so, that
> would be a GCC bug.

No, I haven't tried installing this and testing.

I didn't know that GCC had special handling for system headers.

How does that work?

Cheers,
Carlos.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v3] tftp.h: rework layout to work with fortification
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

References:
- [PATCH v3] tftp.h: rework layout to work with fortification
  - From: Mike Frysinger
- Re: [PATCH v3] tftp.h: rework layout to work with fortification
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: [PATCH v3] tftp.h: rework layout to work with fortification
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]